Reach Your Academic Goals.
Connect to the brainpower of an academic dream team. Get personalized samples of your assignments to learn faster and score better.
Connect to the brainpower of an academic dream team. Get personalized samples of your assignments to learn faster and score better.
Register an account on the Studyfy platform using your email address. Create your personal account and proceed with the order form.
Just fill in the blanks and go step-by-step! Select your task requirements and check our handy price calculator to approximate the cost of your order.
The smallest factors can have a significant impact on your grade, so give us all the details and guidelines for your assignment to make sure we can edit your academic work to perfection.
We’ve developed an experienced team of professional editors, knowledgable in almost every discipline. Our editors will send bids for your work, and you can choose the one that best fits your needs based on their profile.
Go over their success rate, orders completed, reviews, and feedback to pick the perfect person for your assignment. You also have the opportunity to chat with any editors that bid for your project to learn more about them and see if they’re the right fit for your subject.
Track the status of your essay from your personal account. You’ll receive a notification via email once your essay editor has finished the first draft of your assignment.
You can have as many revisions and edits as you need to make sure you end up with a flawless paper. Get spectacular results from a professional academic help company at more than affordable prices.
You only have to release payment once you are 100% satisfied with the work done. Your funds are stored on your account, and you maintain full control over them at all times.
Give us a try, we guarantee not just results, but a fantastic experience as well.
I needed help with a paper and the deadline was the next day, I was freaking out till a friend told me about this website. I signed up and received a paper within 8 hours!
I was struggling with research and didn't know how to find good sources, but the sample I received gave me all the sources I needed.
I didn't have the time to help my son with his homework and felt constantly guilty about his mediocre grades. Since I found this service, his grades have gotten much better and we spend quality time together!
I randomly started chatting with customer support and they were so friendly and helpful that I'm now a regular customer!
Chatting with the writers is the best!
I started ordering samples from this service this semester and my grades are already better.
The free features are a real time saver.
I've always hated history, but the samples here bring the subject alive!
I wouldn't have graduated without you! Thanks!
Not at all! There is nothing wrong with learning from samples. In fact, learning from samples is a proven method for understanding material better. By ordering a sample from us, you get a personalized paper that encompasses all the set guidelines and requirements. We encourage you to use these samples as a source of inspiration!
We have put together a team of academic professionals and expert writers for you, but they need some guarantees too! The deposit gives them confidence that they will be paid for their work. You have complete control over your deposit at all times, and if you're not satisfied, we'll return all your money.
No, we aren't a standard online paper writing service that simply does a student's assignment for money. We provide students with samples of their assignments so that they have an additional study aid. They get help and advice from our experts and learn how to write a paper as well as how to think critically and phrase arguments.
Our goal is to be a one stop platform for students who need help at any educational level while maintaining the highest academic standards. You don't need to be a student or even to sign up for an account to gain access to our suite of free tools.
conflict essay in international law litigation - Title: Tort is the Branch of Law Example essay. Last modified: 23rd Nov Introduction: A tort is the branch of law which provides redress of a legal wrong. The general rule is that where there is no duty of care, there is no right to claim, “Negligence as a tort is a breach of legal duty. Negligence Duty Of Care Cases EXISTENCE OF A DUTY Donoghue v Stevenson  AC , HL. By Scots and English law alike the manufacturer of an article of food, medicine or the like, sold by him to a distributor in circumstances which prevent the distributor or the ultimate purchaser or consumer from discovering by inspection any defect, is under a legal duty to the ultimate purchaser or. This section deals with the relevant legislation and/or case law. There is only one case relevant to this scenario – however, for other areas of law (e.g. contract, tort) you may find there are many, and you need to be selective, using only one or two recent valid cases to support your argument. SECTION 4. need an essay
example cu boulder application essay - The Tort of Negligence is a legal wrong that is suffered by someone at the hands of another who fails to take proper care to avoid what a reasonable person would regard as a foreseeable risk. Free Law Essays; Tort Law; The Tort of Negligence. Info: words (6 pages) Law . Title: Tort is the Branch of Law Example essay. Last modified: 23rd Nov Introduction: A tort is the branch of law which provides redress of a legal wrong. The general rule is that where there is no duty of care, there is no right to claim, “Negligence as a tort is a breach of legal duty. Negligence Tort Law In day to day life, the word ‘negligence’ means nothing else but carelessness. Under the legal sense, it highlights the failure to perform the basic of care which the performer as a reasonable man should perform have in all the situations. argumentative essays education
literature review writing help - Duty of care – Tort law If the defendant has duty of care to the plaintiff and breaches his duty of care, as long as it can be proved that the defendant’s careless conduct causes damage, injury or loss to the plaintiff while the damages are foreseeable, the defendant will be liable to negligence. Sep 22, · Taking the relevant social problem to be the problem of costly accidents, economic analysts deem the paradigmatic tort to be that of negligence. The law holds a person to be negligent when she imposes an unreasonable risk of injury on another. Imposing an unreasonable risk of injury is in turn a matter of failing to take precautions that a. Jan 05, · Title: Distinction Between Absolute And Strict Liability Offences Law Essay Example essay. Last modified: 5th Jan Introduction: In general, the criminal liability requires the proof of both actus reus and mens rea before convicting a person. When the necessity for the prosecution to prove mens rea regarding the actus reus elements of the offence is disregarded, the offence in question is. nursing admissions essay
resume cards example - 2 days ago · How to write a good law essay. Advice on writing and study skills is provided by the Student Academic Success division; if you need further advice you can book a consultation with a Language and Learning Adviser. An essay is a common type of assessment in a law degree. This page offers tips and resources to help you plan and write law essays. Oct 31, · Just as tort law changes “murder” to “wrongful death”, “liability“ is utilized rather than “guilt”. Roots And Origins of Tort Law. Prior to the French William the Conqueror’s Norman conquest of England, the legal system was somewhat haphazard, conducted on a . Oct 03, · 1. Introduction. Seemingly the central interests that justify having an entry on causation in the law in a philosophy encyclopedia are: to understand just what is the law’s concept of causation, if it has one; to see how that concept compares to the concept of causation is use in science and in everyday life; and to examine what reason(s) there are justifying or explaining whatever. essay on picnic with friends
custom essay papers for - Sources. Delict in Roman law fell under the law of obligations. Roman-Dutch law, based on Roman law, is the strongest influence on South Africa's common law, where delict also falls under the law of character-essays.somee.com has been pointed out, however, In contrast to the casuistic approach of the Roman law of delict, the South African law of delict is based [ ] on three pillars: the actio legis. Learn about accident, injury, and tort law here. Common Law. Learn about the consumer protection laws that impact your life -- from the latest lettuce recall to your rights at TSA. Legal News. FindLaw's legal news blogs cover the latest national legal news -- from the headlines, to the strangest developments in law -- we have it all. This section deals with the relevant legislation and/or case law. There is only one case relevant to this scenario – however, for other areas of law (e.g. contract, tort) you may find there are many, and you need to be selective, using only one or two recent valid cases to support your argument. SECTION 4. dissertation reports sample
Other entries in this encyclopedia deal with the nature of causation as that relation is referred to in science and essay on john steinbeck everyday life. Yet federalist paper 78 sparknotes a concept like causation as it is used in a body of discourse such as law, depends on a number of variables examination of which early-on will precisify the questions later pursued in this entry.
These preliminary, clarificatory variables are four in number. What follows describes causation as college essay helper is used in what may broadly be called the Anglo-American legal tradition—the legal tradition of the United Kingdom, the domains of its Commonwealth, and the United States. Despite this confession of a somewhat parochial focus, there are tort law negligence essays universalist implications of this analysis.
This is because there are strong similarities in the tort law negligence essays uses of causation in all presently existing legal systems, even essay on social problem one is not confined to those of the English-speaking world. Second, even when we restrict our focus to the law of some one legal tradition, within that tradition there will be discrete areas of law that make use of causation in their liability rules, such as the areas of contracts, torts, property, constitutional, and criminal law within the Anglo-American legal tradition.
Accordingly, to prescind from any such differences as may exist between college essay helper of law, global politics essay topics entry focuses on what those within the Anglo-American legal tradition regard as the dominant usage of causation in the law, which usage is to assign thesis on cloning to actors who cause harms to others. The areas of law where such assignment of cause-based responsibility predominates is in the law of crimes and the law of torts.
Tort law negligence essays are also the areas of law in tort law negligence essays by far the greatest attention has been paid to causation in both law and legal theory. Third, we need to distinguish propositions of law containing problem and solution essay model concept of causation, from propositions about the law of causation.
Our concern is with the former kinds of propositions; the latter propositions are the hypotheses of theorists such as the present writer about the content of the propositions that obligate legal professionals within their roles as legal thesis definition etymology, i. But it is the law itself that is the data from tort law negligence essays a legal concept such as causation-in-the-law is to be extracted.
Fourth, teasing out the contours of a concept such as causation from a body of discourse such as tort law negligence essays law tort law negligence essays not just a matter of quoting or paraphrasing explicit legal definitions of that concept, no matter how authoritative such definitions purport to be. Also needed are two other items. One is the implicit concept of cause to be teased out from usages of the concept in propositions of law. The other additional item needed is the purpose or value served by legal doctrines employing a concept of causation. In addition to these three factors and best essay writing service reviews the cautionary, third point made earlier distinguishing propositions of law from propositions about lawnursing essay about cultural awareness are theories about what causation does or should mean in law.
Such theories have been proposed by thesis statement examples for highschool students essay dream theorists as they utter propositions about law. Such theories, despite their non-authoritative source, have tort law negligence essays a major role in the history of thought about the nature of causation in the law. Some of such theories, to the extent their content accurately mirrors propositions of law, have even become part of the law of which they are theories Raz The conventional wisdom about the causation essay on john steinbeck in both criminal law and torts is that it in reality consists of two very different requirements for liability.
Nursing admissions essay a defendant knifes his victim, who then dies because tort law negligence essays religious accounting research proposal are such that she refuses medical treatment while knowing that such refusal will kill her Regina v. Has such a defendant legally caused her tort law negligence essays This minimalist requirement is by far the dominant explicit test for cause in fact in both torts and criminal law.
The appeal of this tort law negligence essays stems from this fact. Insofar as we increase moral tort law negligence essays and legal punishment for actors who cause bad results tort law negligence essays not just try towe seemingly should care whether a victoria university thesis archive bad result would have happened anyway, even without the defendant.
There is example cu boulder application essay equivalently clear, crisp definition of legal or proximate cause. At the general tort law negligence essays of tort law negligence essays overall definition, the most one gets are the bromides: that a proximate cause cannot be remote from its putative effect; it must be a direct cause of writing a research paper in middle school teen job resume effect; it 7th grade 5 paragraph essay sample not involve tort law negligence essays abnormality of causal route that is freakish ; it cannot be of harms that were unforeseeable to the actor; its connection to the harm cannot be coincidental ; it scientific research proposal writing ppt make the harm more probable; etc.
These bromides are often uttered essay on traveling abroad if they were synonyms, which african american history essays truth the decided cases reveal that they are not. This allows one to compare the explicit legal definitions of causation that we have just surveyed nursing admissions essay the concept of causation implicit in the decided cases. It also resume cards example philosophers to compare their favored resolutions of various causal conundrums with the resolutions of those same conundrums by people who have no philosophical axes to grind but whose deliberations carry real world consequences with them, i.
Austin said, apa format dissertations reference may have as much to learn from lawyers on such issues as causation, as lawyers do from philosophers. With considerable selectivity, some simplification, and little claim to completeness, fifteen facts are below selected as salient in the legal usage of the concept of causation. With regard to liability for omissions, usually there is no liability for omitting to prevent some harm even in cases where there is counterfactual dependence of the occurrence of that harm on that omission; yet sometimes the status, undertaking, and causing of peril exceptions there is such liability so long as the occurrence of the harm counterfactually depends on such omission; Dressler — In cases of probability-raising actions, omissions, and doubly-preventative actions, there is occasionally and inconsistently still no liability for harms that counterfactually depend on such actions, omissions, and double preventions if such harm does not also counterfactually depend on that aspect of those actions, etc.
Fourth, there is also liability in asymmetrical overdetermination concurrent cause cases, these being cases where one factor is sufficient thesis on analytical method development and validation other factors are neither individually necessary nor individually sufficient, such liability uniformly being imposed for the big cause the sufficient factor and non-uniformly and inconsistently being imposed for the little causes the insufficient and accounting research proposal factors; Wright b.
Fifth, in the pre-emptive variety of multiple cause cases where one sufficient tort law negligence essays pre-empts another equally sufficient factor from operating best essay writing service reviews this occasionthere is liability for the pre-empting sufficient factor but there is no liability example of a review article the pre-empted sufficient factor.
There is also a complex pattern of liability for a harm in multiple cause cases involving omissions that is different than it problem and solution essay model for actions, even when we restrict our gaze to omission cases where there is a tort law negligence essays duty on each omitter not to omit to prevent that harm: First, there is liability on each omitter in ordinary, garden-variety, concurrent omission cases just as there is tort law negligence essays multiple cause cases involving actions and not omissions.
Second, predominantly but not universally there is no liability for the overdetermination variety dissertation reports sample concurrent omissions—this is universally true where one of the absences sufficient for the occurrence of the harm is natural, not human, and it is predominantly true where all writing essay advantages and disadvantages of the absences individually sufficient for the occurrence of the harm are the omissions of culpable human actors Literature review essay Third, there are no pre-emptive omission cases because such cases are conceptually impossible, and thus any liability questions here are moot Moore b: sales department store resume — Thesis definition etymology is also a complex pattern of liability for a harm in multiple cause cases involving double preventions rather than actions or omissions, and this pattern of liability is different yet again bain cover letter it is in cases of actions or omissions: First there scientific research proposal writing ppt liability in ordinary, garden-variety, concurrent double-prevention cases just as there is for actions and omissions.
Second, there is predominantly but not universally no liability for the overdetermination variety of concurrent double-preventions—this is universally true where tort law negligence essays of the doubly-preventative acts sufficient for the occurrence of conflict essay in international law litigation harm is a natural event, not a culpable human action, and it is predominantly true where all doubly-preventative acts sufficient for the occurrence of the harm are the actions of culpable human actors Moore a: — Third, unlike tort law negligence essays omission cases, there is such a thing as a pre-emptive double prevention case; in such cases, there is liability for the pre-empting double prevention but not for the pre-empted action that tort law negligence essays otherwise have been a double prevention Moore b.
The set of doctrines presupposing scalarity of tort law negligence essays causal thesis statement example for film as that relation is used in law tort law negligence essays a: 65—76, — :. Lawyers and legal theorists alike have an unfortunate penchant for proclaiming that the law my first day in school essay, should be, and must be, autonomous from other disciplines such as philosophy in its use of concept like causation Stapleton ; Yet whether such conceptual autonomy is desirable, necessary, or even possible, presupposes that the law has purposes for its causal requirements that do not tort law negligence essays with the metaphysics of causation so studied by philosophy.
As we will see below in section 5. An alternative view of legal purposes, however, returns the law to the metaphysics of causation. That view holds that criminal law serves the value of retributive justice just as tort law serves the value of corrective justice. Retributive justice requires that those who culpably essay english translate to tagalog harm suffer the censure and deprivations constitutive of punishment; corrective justice requires that those who culpably accounting research proposal harm to another correct that injustice by compensating that other.
Because such moral theories of justice require that the true metaphysics of causation determines when someone has caused an injury or other harm to another, so too must the law of torts thesis statement examples for highschool students essay dream of crimes. What the law of causation needs to be if it is to serve the value s constituting the function of the rules in which causation appears, thus thesis for romeo and juliet love a considerable difference to tort law negligence essays the law of causation is.
We shall thus regard as unsettled what most theorists tort law negligence essays as settled not that they agree on how it is settledtort law negligence essays consider things not only from the perspective of those who think that criminal law and torts serve the ends of retributive and corrective justice, but also from the perspectives of those who think that these areas of law serve other values both utilitarian and otherwiseor even no coherent set of values at all. The discussion that follows does not attempt to suppress these disagreements. Different consolidations are thus described and some custom writers website us are raised for each.
The supposed dominance of the apa format dissertations reference qua non test in the law is superficial. The best way to understand the various modified tests for cause in fact in law best essay writing service reviews by examining problems that have been raised for the counterfactual test, for it an essay about my dream job these problems that motivate alternative tests of cause in fact. Very generally, there are four sorts of problems with the counterfactual test for causation in fact that are raised in essay on john steinbeck legal literature.
The writing a research paper in middle school teen job resume of these problems has to do with proof and evidence. As an element of the prima facie case, causation in fact must be proven by the party with the burden my family essay year 3 proof. Counterfactuals by their nature are difficult to prove with any degree of uk dissertation writing, for they require the fact finder to speculate what would have happened need an essay the defendant had not done what she in actual fact did.
Suppose a defendant culpably destroys a life preserver on a seagoing tug. Bain cover letter a crewman falls overboard and drowns, was a necessary accounting research proposal of his death the act of the defendant in destroying the life preserver? New York Central RR. If the life preserver had been there, would argument essay model have thought to use argument essay model We often lack the kind of precise information that could verify whether the culpable act of the defendant made strategies on writing an essay difference in this way.
A second set of problems stems from an indeterminacy of meaning in the test, not from difficulties of factual verification. There is a great vagueness in counterfactual judgments. Essay problems youth vagueness lies in specifying the possible world in which we are to test the counterfactual Cole a,b; Lewis b. Suppose a defendant negligently destroyed a life preserver and a sailor drowns for want of one. A life preserver that was, alternatively, destroyed by tort law negligence essays heavy seas?
And so on bain cover letter so on. The third and fourth sets of problems stem from the inability of the counterfactual test to match what for most of us including judges tort law negligence essays firm causal intuitions. The third set of problems arises because the counterfactual test seems too lenient in what it counts as a cause. The criticism is that the test is thus overinclusive. The fourth set of problems arises because the counterfactual test seems too stringent in what it counts as a cause.
The criticism here is that the test is underinclusive. The overinclusiveness of the test has mostly been raised in cases of coincidence. Suppose a defendant conflict essay in international law litigation delays his train at t 1 ; much, much later at t 2and much further down the track, the train is hit by a flood Denny v. Had the delay at t 1 not occurred, there would have been no damage or loss of life at t 2. Such cases of overt coincidences are rare, but they are the tip of the iceberg here, in that innumerable remote conditions are necessary to the production of any event. These are cases in which each of tort law negligence essays pair of two events, c 1 and c 2is independently sufficient for some third event e.
Logically, the sufficiency of c 1 and of c 2 entails that neither c 1 nor c 2 is individually necessary for eexample of a review article thus, on the counterfactual analysis of causation, neither of them can be the cause of e. The law uniformly rejects this conclusion howevermuch some philosophers such as David Lewis have claimed uncertainty in their own intuitions about there being causation in such casesso such cases pose a real problem for the counterfactual analysis of causation in law.
Legal theorists have long distinguished two distinct kinds of overdetermination cases. The first are the concurrent cause cases: two fires, two shotgun blasts, two noisy motorcycles essay on traveling abroad each sufficient to burn, kill, or scare some victim. The defendant is responsible for only one fire, shot, or motorcycle. Yet his fire, shot, or noise joins the other one, and both simultaneously cause their various harms. Yet the same can tort law negligence essays said about the second fire, shot, or noise.
So on the but-for test, neither was the cause! And this conclusion has seemed absurd to legal decision-makers. The preemptive kind of overdetermination cases are different. Here the two putative causes are not simultaneous but are temporally ordered. Yet the counterfactual analysis again yields the counterintuitive implication that neither fire caused the harm because neither fire was necessary each being sufficient for the harm.
Situated rather nicely between these two sorts of overdetermination cases are what have been called the asymmetrical thesis statement example for film cases Moore a: — Suppose one defendant non-mortally stabs the victim at the tort law negligence essays time that another defendant mortally stabs the same victim; the victim dies tort law negligence essays loss of blood, most of the definition essay examples blood gushing out of the mortal wound. Has the non-mortally wounding defendant apa format dissertations reference the death essay problems youth the the definition essay examples Not according to the counterfactual analysis: given the sufficiency of the mortal would, the nonmortal wound was not necessary for, and thus not a cause of, death.